From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30997 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2004 04:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30963 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 04:59:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.panix.com) (166.84.1.72) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 04:59:11 -0000 Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA4C48725; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:59:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kingdon@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i7I4xBr26570; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:59:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 05:26:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200408180459.i7I4xBr26570@panix5.panix.com> From: Jim Kingdon To: hronne@comhem.se Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Hans Ronne on Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:48:29 +0200) Subject: Re: Major bug and what to do about it (long) References: (message from Hans Ronne on Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:30:53 +0200) X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00946.txt.bz2 > What happens if you just move around in the ocean without hitting > 'a'? If there is no submarine, then you expend an ACP. Whereas hitting "a" where there is no submarine doesn't cost you anything. > It would seem more logical to me if it was the other way around, > that is if direct attacks against invisible units were impossible > while overrun attacks were possible. So "a" would only attack units you can see, but overruns would possibly attack units you can't see? That sounds logical.