From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-4069-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15469 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2004 15:05:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15295 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2004 15:05:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.panix.com) (166.84.1.74)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2004 15:05:37 -0000
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5])
	by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918F1981D1;
	Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from kingdon@localhost)
	by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i7UF5aC17115;
	Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 06:02:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200408301505.i7UF5aC17115@panix5.panix.com>
From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@panix.com>
To: mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <4132563F.4070105@phy.cmich.edu> (message from Eric McDonald on
	Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:18:39 -0600)
Subject: Re: lowering independent-density
References: <200408292122.i7TLMj302934@panix5.panix.com> <4132563F.4070105@phy.cmich.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01084.txt.bz2

> We also discussed the possibility of making either the higher density or 
> the lower density into a variant on Standard.

I wouldn't object, but unless there is dissent to the idea that the
lower density is the better game, that should be the default (and the
basis for the other variants).