From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27546 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2004 01:48:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27539 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2004 01:48:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web13121.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.174.83) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2004 01:48:19 -0000 Message-ID: <20040905014819.70407.qmail@web13121.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.164.245.93] by web13121.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 18:48:19 PDT Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 06:02:00 -0000 From: Elijah Meeks Subject: Feature Request: Advance Prohibits Advance To: Xconq list In-Reply-To: <4139FF56.9070801@phy.cmich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01103.txt.bz2 As it stands, there's no way to simulate different tech paths. I'd like to have a way to shut off advances if certain advances are researched, so that sides can choose different directions to take. For example, if we have two spacefaring societies, we can have two techs, one being Ground War Focus and the other Stellar War Focus. The side that pics Ground War Focus spends less on developing AT-ATs and Battlemechs and more for its Cordships and A-Wing Starfighters while the other side has to pay extra to develop its hovertanks but manages to design galaxy-class starships and battlestars at a faster rate. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail