From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9639 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2004 19:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9627 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2004 19:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO low-shang.homelinux.com) (66.11.182.29) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2004 19:29:02 -0000 Received: by low-shang.homelinux.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 096DE3358E; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:31:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 20:21:00 -0000 To: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Progress with ParaGUI Message-ID: <20041107193123.GA3140@low-shang.homelinux.com> Mail-Followup-To: xconq7@sources.redhat.com References: <418DDCEA.1060404@phy.cmich.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <418DDCEA.1060404@phy.cmich.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: tlow@low-shang.homelinux.com (Tom Low-Shang) X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01392.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 01:29:30AM -0700, Eric McDonald wrote: > Hello Xconq Developers, > > I am making good progress in preparing Xconq to use the ParaGUI > toolkit for the SDL interface. The Linux side of things is essentially > taken care of; I have already made RPM packages for ParaGUI. Debian has packages in testing and unstable branches for paragui 1.0.4. Will this version be sufficient for xconq? -- Tom Low-Shang \ Toronto, Canada Software Developer / 416 321 1394 * Embedded Systems \ tlow@low-shang.homelinux.com * Industrial Automation /