From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6272 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2004 02:11:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6182 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2004 02:10:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web13122.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.174.126) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2004 02:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 6143 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Nov 2004 02:10:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20041111021051.6138.qmail@web13122.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [138.202.34.154] by web13122.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:10:51 PST Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:42:00 -0000 From: Elijah Meeks Subject: Re: New Home for Xconq Project? To: xconq7@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200411101556.35729.cstevens@gencom.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01401.txt.bz2 > I certainly think so. You know, when people search > for "strategy game" at > Savannah or SourceForge, Xconq ought to be right up > there because it's just > about the best thing going for this genre of > software. Xconq has the > "where-with-all" to play with the big boys and I > believe it should. This is true, and I think it's as much an indication that we could use a higher profile as it is that sf.net should do a better job of listing open-source projects not hosted on their foundries. Just a note, but I had Cast Iron Life hosted on sf.net (The project page is still there and I occasionally link to it at http://castironlife.sf.net ) and it was one of the top five projects for a few months and we never even got out of alpha. There's really no competition for XConq and we may be able to absorb some of the other projects into the XConq framework. Higher visibility = more eyeballs. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com