From: Erik <freeciv@home.se>
To: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Xconq-general] Xconq Ranking at Sourceforge
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 13:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412041339.02982.freeciv@home.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B1078E.4030508@phy.cmich.edu>
lördag 04 december 2004 01.40 skrev Eric McDonald:
> To quote Sourceforge docs:
>
> "The current project rankings formula is as follows:
>
> log (3 * # of forum posts for that week) + log (4 * # of tasks ftw) +
> log (3 * # bugs ftw) + log (10 * patches ftw) + log (5 * tracker items
> ftw) + log (# commits to CVS ftw) + log (5 * # file releases ftw) + log
> (.3 * # downloads ftw)"
>
> As you can see, downloads are dropped to 3/10 of their value, but
> tracker items are multiplied by 5 and patches by 10. Since logs
> (presumably base-10) are being taken, an order of magnitude will only
> vary by 1. If Bochs' downloads are 100 times more than ours, their score
> only gains 2 over ours. By contrast, we had 3 patches in the past week,
> and 3*10 = 30, so our score gained 1.x for that. Plus, we had 3 new
> tasks, so our score gained 1.y for that. So, with those two terms alone
> we could hypothetically close the gap.
When I saw that formula it was obvious to me that it does not weight the
data. Since I found that strange I searched for the documentation. And it
says: "We are aware that the current formula does not actually weight the
data aggregated for rankings (the formula was misdesigned and has not yet
been replaced)."
[http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=14040&group_id=1]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-04 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-03 17:32 Eric McDonald
2004-12-04 0:41 ` [Xconq-general] " Elijah Meeks
2004-12-04 0:50 ` Eric McDonald
2004-12-04 5:04 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-12-04 13:03 ` Erik [this message]
2004-12-04 17:08 ` mskala
2004-12-04 22:38 ` Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412041339.02982.freeciv@home.se \
--to=freeciv@home.se \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).