From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16837 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2004 01:13:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16797 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2004 01:13:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web13122.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.174.126) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2004 01:13:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 61239 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Dec 2004 01:13:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20041212011304.61237.qmail@web13122.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.164.122.15] by web13122.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:13:03 PST Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 02:11:00 -0000 From: Elijah Meeks Subject: Reduced Image Quality for 32x32 Pixel Units To: xconq7@sources.redhat.com, xconq-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <41BA7BF3.8030302@phy.cmich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01470.txt.bz2 I've noticed in the new release of XConq that any unit images based on a 32x32 size now appear chunky and enlarged. I submitted a bug report at sf.net/projects/xconq and you can see it most readily in Opal. There you'll notice that images based on a 44x44 pixel size appear fine (The cities, for the most part) while the 32x32 pixel units (The swordsmen, heroes, et cetera) all appear worse. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250