From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25099 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 00:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25083 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 00:35:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.202.64) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 00:35:28 -0000 Received: from [192.168.181.128] (c-67-172-156-222.client.comcast.net[67.172.156.222]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004081700352801600dbvq9e>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:35:28 +0000 Message-ID: <412152C4.3070600@phy.cmich.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:50:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elijah Meeks CC: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Wrecked-Type Doesn't Apply to Detonating Units References: <20040816182429.61267.qmail@web13121.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040816182429.61267.qmail@web13121.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00906.txt.bz2 Elijah Meeks wrote: > Example: > > (unit city (wrecked-type nuked-city)) > > (table wrecked-type-if-killed > (city u* ruined-city) > ) Yes. This is what I had in mind. > I'll check this at home, but my understanding of the > wreck-typing code is that the result would be what I'm > looking for, a different wreck-type as a result of an > exploding unit which ignores the > wrecked-type-if-killed table but does call the > wrecked-type unit property. > > That would work. OK, good. If it doesn't do what you need, let me know, and I will try to work out a better arrangement in the fairly near future. Eric