From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10074 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2004 00:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10062 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 00:49:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.198.39) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 00:49:33 -0000 Received: from [192.168.181.128] (c-67-172-156-222.client.comcast.net[67.172.156.222]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004081800493201500sd9dje>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:49:33 +0000 Message-ID: <4122A78C.20308@phy.cmich.edu> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 03:00:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Ronne CC: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: The selective fire-at command References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00944.txt.bz2 Hans Ronne wrote: > Indeed, and as I also stated I can appreciate the potential usefulness of > both commands, even if I rarely use them myself. Keeping them is on my > revised agenda, and I am even trying to fix the tcltk fire-at command so > that it finally will work. Excellent. Eric