From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-3964-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11539 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2004 01:21:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11532 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2004 01:21:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.198.39)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2004 01:21:49 -0000
Received: from [192.168.181.128] (c-67-172-156-222.client.comcast.net[67.172.156.222])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <2004082101214801500p8shhe>; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:21:49 +0000
Message-ID: <4126A38D.2010803@phy.cmich.edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 02:31:00 -0000
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca
CC:  xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Three thoughts
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0408201937500.11923-100000@diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0408201937500.11923-100000@diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00979.txt.bz2

mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Eric McDonald wrote:

> When the fancy wrecking behaviour started to be defined, I realised that
> if I changed my game concept a little I could use fancy wrecking instead
> of item objects (basically, have one unit type for "has item" and one for 
> "doesn't have item", although it also meant changing my vision of what
> that signified), and produce a more fun result.  Wrecking seemed to be in
> a lot of flux and then my workload at school started to ramp up and so I
> decided to leave that project alone for a while, hoping that by the time I
> got back to it the fancy wrecking behaviour would have gelled into
> something I could use.

Do you find the wrecking and 'change-type' behavior to now be suitable 
for your needs, or is an ingredient still missing?

(Also, I think you were the one who requested the 'remove-list' (as 
opposed to 'remove') capability, IIRC. That capability now exists in Xconq.)

Eric