From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 476 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2004 02:04:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 458 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2004 02:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.202.55) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2004 02:04:21 -0000 Received: from [192.168.181.128] (c-67-172-156-222.client.comcast.net[67.172.156.222]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20040829020420011008edq3e>; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 02:04:20 +0000 Message-ID: <413139A0.2070005@phy.cmich.edu> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 02:53:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca CC: Robert Goulding , xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Net Game Showstopper References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01069.txt.bz2 mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > If you send a message to the list, then you probably reveal your IP > address anyway, because it appears in the headers. At the time you sent > the above, it appears that your IP address was 68.251.117.96. And it is on an Ameritech DSL connection by the looks of it. Nonetheless, it is probably not a good idea to go around putting one's IP address in a public forum, where it is easily accessible, since many ISP's will renew a DHCP lease over and over again using the same address, which prolongs the period someone may be a more highly visible target. Eric