From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18377 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2004 15:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18362 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 15:24:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.198.39) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 15:24:38 -0000 Received: from [192.168.181.128] (c-67-172-156-222.client.comcast.net[67.172.156.222]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <200409261524370150091bo5e>; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:24:37 +0000 Message-ID: <4156DF31.9060000@phy.cmich.edu> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:01:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca CC: xconq7 Subject: Re: New Source Tarball and Windows Installer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01248.txt.bz2 mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Eric McDonald wrote: > >> I have released a new installer for Windows and new source tarball. >>They can be gotten at: >> http://xconq_hacker.home.comcast.net > > Will you be checking these into CVS? Is CVS still a good way to stay > up to date at all? I get the impression a lot of recent work (not > just yours) hasn't been going in there. This is a bit of a tricky issue. If all was well and good, then I would have been checking in regularly during the past month. However, due to an incident that occurred last month (and several minor ones before then), I feel that I cannot guarantee the integrity of what I commit to the CVS repository on 'sources.redhat.com'. This has led me to maintain my own personal CVS repository. I know that this may be inconvenient to some, and I'm sorry for the inconvenience. I hope that the situation can be resolved on good terms in the near future, which is why I continue to associate with the Xconq project. If not, then I suppose you will have the option of checking my alternative sources (under a different "banner") out of a public CVS repository somewhere else, sometime in the future.... As for others not checking in things, there are only a few others who have CVS write access, and of them, only Jim has shown vital signs in the past month. I am not aware of anyone else, who has CVS write access, maintaining a separate branch to the sources. Eric