From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30415 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2004 22:59:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30319 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2004 22:59:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.202.64) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2004 22:59:40 -0000 Received: from [192.168.181.128] (c-67-172-156-222.client.comcast.net[67.172.156.222]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004101022593901600c687se>; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:59:39 +0000 Message-ID: <4169BED8.6090903@phy.cmich.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:45:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elijah Meeks CC: xconq7 Subject: Re: New Windows Installer and Source Tarballs References: <20041010225159.62809.qmail@web13126.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041010225159.62809.qmail@web13126.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01346.txt.bz2 Elijah Meeks wrote: >> There are a number of bugfixes in the new >>prelease. Also, there are > > It doesn't seem like looks-like and see-mistake-chance > do what they're supposed to? Is this the case or are > my tables still screwy? Your 'see-mistake-chance' looks fine. Technically, you don't need to crank the weight up so high in 'looks-like', but it shouldn't matter. If you want to see the bugfix at work, start up the 'battle-bug.xcq' game that you sent me. You will (should) see the markers instead of the ships for the two furthest out Fed vessels. Eric