From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7899 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2004 20:21:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7885 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2004 20:21:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) (216.148.227.85) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2004 20:21:53 -0000 Received: from [192.168.181.128] (unknown[67.176.41.158](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004110720215201400s9vu7e>; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 20:21:52 +0000 Message-ID: <418E83CC.1080000@phy.cmich.edu> Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:44:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Low-Shang CC: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Progress with ParaGUI References: <418DDCEA.1060404@phy.cmich.edu> <20041107193123.GA3140@low-shang.homelinux.com> In-Reply-To: <20041107193123.GA3140@low-shang.homelinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01393.txt.bz2 Tom Low-Shang wrote: >> I am making good progress in preparing Xconq to use the ParaGUI >>toolkit for the SDL interface. The Linux side of things is essentially >>taken care of; I have already made RPM packages for ParaGUI. > > Debian has packages in testing and unstable branches for paragui > 1.0.4. Will this version be sufficient for xconq? Yes. 1.0.4 is the latest stable version of that toolkit, and is, in fact, what I am planning on building the Xconq SDL interface against. There is too much change taking place in their development branch (currently at version 1.1.8). Regards, Eric