From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25479 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2004 05:23:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25452 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2004 05:23:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc12.comcast.net) (204.127.202.56) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2004 05:23:18 -0000 Received: from [192.168.181.128] (c-67-176-41-158.client.comcast.net[67.176.41.158]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004120405231701200arfene>; Sat, 4 Dec 2004 05:23:17 +0000 Message-ID: <41B149C2.2030902@phy.cmich.edu> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 12:40:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca CC: xconq7 , xconq-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: How long was *that* there, I wonder? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01458.txt.bz2 mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > because I thought it was obvious what it did. You call it > with coordinates and a parameter 1 to set a bit, and you call it with > coordinates and a parameter 0 to clear a bit. Right? One would think. > I'm not sure of the moral of the story - maybe "It's a good idea to trace > down into those low-level functions once in a while". For such a simple > bug, this one soaked up a lot of debugging hours. Well, I'm glad you caught and fixed your bug. There is still something nasty lurking in my modified 'see_cell' code, and I still haven't caught it. Eric