* Cconq (was: Tcl/Tk Interface Unification)
@ 2003-09-07 21:34 Feneric Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Feneric Brown @ 2003-09-07 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xconq7
Out of curiosity, how will the interface reorganization affect the old
Cconq variant, if at all? Believe it or not there are still Cconq
users out there, and in fact our ISP maintains a fairly up-to-date
version (7.4.1) for shell account users...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Cconq (was: Tcl/Tk Interface Unification)
@ 2003-09-08 3:39 Eric McDonald
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric McDonald @ 2003-09-08 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xconq7; +Cc: feneric
From: Feneric Brown <feneric at saugus dot net>
To: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
>Out of curiosity, how will the interface reorganization affect
>the
>old
>Cconq variant, if at all? Believe it or not there are still
>Cconq
>users out there, and in fact our ISP maintains a fairly
>up-to-date
>version (7.4.1) for shell account users...
Hi Feneric,
Should not affect you or any other Cconquerors at all. Actually,
it shouldn't affect anyone. We are not really throwing anything
out; ...just relocating where some of the build process occurs.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-07 21:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-07 21:34 Cconq (was: Tcl/Tk Interface Unification) Feneric Brown
2003-09-08 3:39 Eric McDonald
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).