From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11810 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2003 03:36:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11801 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 03:36:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO outbound28-2.lax.untd.com) (64.136.28.160) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 03:36:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 22785 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 03:36:07 -0000 Received: from 66-52-245-11.sttl.dial.netzero.com (HELO vangogh) (66.52.245.11) by smtp02.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 03:36:07 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "xconq" Subject: MSVC build environment? Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 03:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2 From: Hans Ronne [mailto:hronne@comhem.se] > > An alternative to cygwin/mingw is to use a Windows native build > environment. It is now possible to build xconq for Windows > using either Visual C or CodeWarrior. > > [...] > > And INSTALL-win is the only Windows-specific file, since xconq/win > has been retired. Ok, using the CVS web interface to look at INSTALL-win, I see a section on "Building Xconq using MS Visual C++" with a lot of ... blank lines. Also there are no MSVC project files anywhere in the source tree as far as I can tell, and as far as you seem to say. So who is really doing this? Is building under MSVC a reality, or a claim? Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA Taking risk where others will not.