From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19693 invoked by alias); 21 May 2004 02:19:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19671 invoked from network); 21 May 2004 02:19:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO s-hertogenbosch.execulink.net) (199.166.6.44) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 May 2004 02:19:09 -0000 Received: from diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (ppp42.ac2.56k.execulink.com [209.213.229.42]) by s-hertogenbosch.execulink.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4L2J8x25923; Thu, 20 May 2004 22:19:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (mskala@localhost) by diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i4L2IMo23370; Thu, 20 May 2004 22:18:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 02:19:00 -0000 From: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca To: Elijah Meeks cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Bug Report: Wreck Spawning While Occupant In-Reply-To: <20040521014044.43815.qmail@web13126.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 On Thu, 20 May 2004, Elijah Meeks wrote: > It looks like units that are supposed to spawn a > wrecked-type upon destruction do not do so when > destroyed as an occupant. That would explain some problems I've been observing but haven't been able to characterize precisely yet. I thought what I was seeing was the result of bad or misunderstood *capture* logic, but the problem might easily be with wrecking instead. -- Matthew Skala mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca Embrace and defend. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/