From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15199 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2004 02:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15190 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2004 02:31:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailrouter3.execulink.net) (199.166.6.58) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2004 02:31:34 -0000 Received: from diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (ppp116.ac2.56k.execulink.com [209.213.229.116]) by mailrouter3.execulink.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7L2VWY01994; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:31:33 -0400 Received: from localhost (mskala@localhost) by diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i7L2SM002193; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:28:22 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 04:33:00 -0000 From: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca To: Eric McDonald cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Three thoughts In-Reply-To: <4126A38D.2010803@phy.cmich.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00980.txt.bz2 On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Eric McDonald wrote: > Do you find the wrecking and 'change-type' behavior to now be suitable > for your needs, or is an ingredient still missing? Well, I haven't really decided yet exactly how I want to use the new features, and until I do, I won't really know if they do what I want, but my impression is that they'll probably be more than sufficient. > (Also, I think you were the one who requested the 'remove-list' (as > opposed to 'remove') capability, IIRC. That capability now exists in Xconq.) Yes - thanks. -- Matthew Skala mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca Embrace and defend. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/