From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7288 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2004 16:36:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7279 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2004 16:36:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urk.execulink.net) (199.166.6.45) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2004 16:36:50 -0000 Received: from diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (ppp159.ac2.56k.execulink.com [209.213.229.159]) by urk.execulink.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i85GaBB23428; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:36:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (mskala@localhost) by diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i85GWAn29400; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:32:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:41:00 -0000 From: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca To: Eric McDonald cc: Elijah Meeks , Xconq list Subject: Re: Feature Request: Advance Prohibits Advance In-Reply-To: <413B3619.7090605@phy.cmich.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01107.txt.bz2 Can't we make some advances require particular materials? I think we already can, and if not, that would be easy to add. Then we could easily do both behaviours. For "you may only have one of these advances", there's a material of which you only get a little bit, and you need all of it to do either advance. Once you have done one, you can't do the other. For "it's very hard, but possible, to do both of these advances", it's a similar story, but you can eventually with a lot of work gain more of the special material. -- Matthew Skala mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca Embrace and defend. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/