From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12230 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2004 00:41:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12218 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 00:41:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO s-hertogenbosch.execulink.net) (199.166.6.44) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 00:41:17 -0000 Received: from diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (ppp290.ac2.56k.execulink.com [209.239.26.36]) by s-hertogenbosch.execulink.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8T0fFH19433; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:41:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (mskala@localhost) by diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i8T0bTx05875; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:37:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:38:00 -0000 From: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca To: Eric McDonald cc: Lincoln Peters , Xconq list Subject: Re: Transports that affect protection? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01276.txt.bz2 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Eric McDonald wrote: > As I recall, there is already a property out there which affects > an occupant's height (for the purpose of vision). Perhaps this > could be commandeered for some sort of attack modification as > well. Just a thought.... What if you made the siege tower the attacker, modified by the knights in it, instead of the knights the attackers modified by the siege tower? Having the siege tower be the attacker may be less intuitive, but it might fit more easily into the existing capabilities of XConq. -- Matthew Skala mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca Embrace and defend. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/