From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20800 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2004 00:40:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20785 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 00:40:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO urk.execulink.net) (199.166.6.45) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 00:40:06 -0000 Received: from diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (ppp436.ac2.56k.execulink.com [209.239.26.182]) by urk.execulink.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8U0e4s04402; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:40:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (mskala@localhost) by diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i8TCpsU23326; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:51:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:05:00 -0000 From: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca To: Eric McDonald cc: Lincoln Peters , Xconq list Subject: Re: Transports that affect protection? In-Reply-To: <415A1B75.4090707@phy.cmich.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01290.txt.bz2 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Eric McDonald wrote: > If you can tell us which tables could be utilized to do that (with model > 0 combat; it seems to be possible with model 1 combat), I am sure that Hm. I had a vague idea that there were a lot of tables for occupants' effects on their transports, but it looks like I may have been thinking of your proposal rather than what's actually implemented. All I can find now is occupant-combat, which actually goes the other way (transport affecting occupants, as the original poster wanted) and it seems to be unimplemented. -- Matthew Skala mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca Embrace and defend. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/