From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29367 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2003 16:00:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29358 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 16:00:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 16:00:34 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:00:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E377870011; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:00:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:29:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Charles Goodwin Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 7.5 release? In-Reply-To: <3F7065D7.8030005@xwt.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2003 16:00:28.0044 (UTC) FILETIME=[CEA0ACC0:01C381EB] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00444.txt.bz2 On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Charles Goodwin wrote: > I took the 'imminent' from a mail to the list from Hans back in January > that said 'approaching' and 'in a few months'. I see. I guess the only thing I have to say about this is that slipped release dates are fairly common in commercial software development. And, of course, Xconq is a 100% volunteer effort by people who generally have full-time jobs. So, the fact that the date has slipped is not surprising to me. (Hans once told me that he was targeting the end of summer, but that passed a couple of days ago, and I'm not bothered in the least.) Regards, Eric