From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8016 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2003 14:17:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8007 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 14:17:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 14:17:14 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:17:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C28270017; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:17:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:02:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: "Brandon J. Van Every" Cc: xconq Subject: RE: Canonical Windows build environment? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2003 14:17:10.0490 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B88BBA0:01C3A215] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00557.txt.bz2 Hello Brandon, On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > Ok, as per INSTALL-win instructions, I've tried the following with > Cygwin: > > ./configure --x-includes=/usr/src/tcltk-20030901-1/tk/xlib/X11 --with-tc > lconfig=/lib --with-tkconfig=/lib Could you send the error output to the list? I would like to look at it, and if Juergen is around, he might also have something to say.... The problem with the INSTALL-win document is that it is an amalgam of his original doc (which dated back roughly 3 years ago and refered to much older packages) and updated information I put in. I took the liberty of updating some of his package references to newer ones, but did not necessarily verify that said packages still behaved in the way the old ones did. I did not hear Juergen complain, so I let things be, thinking that I had made reasonable assumptions. Have you tried building with the ActiveState Tcl/Tk? I have verified that. It was my intent to verify things Juergen's way someday, and to do a purely MinGW32 build. I didn't consider them top priorities though, since I think the vast majority of our Windows users are interested in prepackaged binaries rather than building Xconq themselves. > get the same choking, looking for Xlib.h. Is that expected? If Not particularly. > estimate of when the major overhaul of the config and Makefiles will be > completed? I mentioned several weeks ago that the "major surgery" has been taken care of. Among other things, this means that the Windows and Unix builds of Xconq have been unified. It doesn't have much to do with the Tcl/Tk build per se. Regards, Eric