From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25826 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2003 16:27:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25810 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2003 16:27:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2003 16:27:06 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:26:43 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3795370015; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:26:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:37:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Hans Ronne Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Windows Installer for Xconq In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2003 16:26:43.0501 (UTC) FILETIME=[6F05D5D0:01C3A2F0] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00581.txt.bz2 On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Hans Ronne wrote: > >available: Standard (for players), Premium (for game designers), > >and Everything (includes source code). > > That's nice. But "Premium" really sounds like some kind of commercial > service that people would have to pay for. Couldn't we have "Game Designer" > instead, as Jim suggested? We could, but "Game Designer" makes it sound like that you are getting some kind of game designer, and not necessarily everything needed to play Xconq. How about "1-topping", "2-toppings", and "the works"? Or maybe that sounds too commercial (and a bit "cheesy"). Seriously, how about we just drop the fancy labels, and say "For Players", "For Game Designers", and "Everything"? Eric