From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4151 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2003 20:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4115 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2003 20:17:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 20:17:37 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:16:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811927001B; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:16:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:29:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Elijah Meeks Cc: pzgndr@hotmail.com, Subject: Re: Strategic Range in Xconq In-Reply-To: <20031118193415.53010.qmail@web13102.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2003 20:16:58.0754 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB56A620:01C3AE10] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00773.txt.bz2 Hello Elijah, Bill, On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Elijah Meeks wrote: > I think this is the biggest feature for future > versions of xconq, because it really is just a > tactical simulator until we get some kind of working > diplomatic/political model. Acutally, there is disabled support in the existing Xconq kernel for what are known as "side agreements". My understanding is that it was commented and #if 0'd out because it didn't work right. So, "implementing" this feature might involve fixing the existing one. >This means, of course, > getting the AI to work it right, and it's likely a > Herculean task, Possibly. Eric