public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Lincoln Peters <sampln@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>, Xconq list <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: UI proposal
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311191448090.31399-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1069268813.29637.130206.camel@odysseus.peterslan>

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lincoln Peters wrote:

> The comments that follow in this message assume that (most of) the
> developers still want to use SDL for a new Xconq interface.

I am still have much to learn about both GTK and SDL, but I am not 
sure that these two things are diametrically opposed. I 
can see using SDL to do cross-platform graphics/video work, while 
using GTK to do cross-platform UI work (similar to my suggestion 
about wxWindows). The downside is that this makes Xconq have two 
external software dependencies instead of one.... Also, I could be 
way off base here. Like I said, I will research it more this 
weekend.

> Using dock items in GTK+/GNOME interfaces, it is possible not only to
> move a dock item from one edge of the screen to another, but also to
> turn a dock item into a floating window.  That would very closely mimic
> the behavior of the Mac interface.  How difficult would it be do set
> that up using SDL?

One thing that any solution should address is whether layout 
managers are available. Being able to plop down a window or any 
other component and have the other components be rearranged in an 
aesthetically pleasing manner with minimal functional impedance to 
the user and with minimal guidance from the programmer is a 
desirable trait.

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-19 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-19 18:37 Elijah Meeks
2003-11-19 19:01 ` Hans Ronne
2003-11-19 19:49   ` Lincoln Peters
2003-11-19 20:03     ` UI proposal (more screenshots) Lincoln Peters
2003-11-19 20:04     ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2003-11-19 20:36   ` UI proposal Elijah Meeks
2003-11-20  9:33   ` Andreas Bringedal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-19  8:22 Lincoln Peters
2003-11-19 12:15 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2003-11-19 19:02   ` Lincoln Peters
2003-11-19 14:51 ` Peter Garrone
2003-11-19 14:51   ` Erik Jessen
2003-11-19 15:24     ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-11-19 17:25       ` Eric McDonald
2003-11-20  0:35       ` Brandon J. Van Every
2003-11-19 17:09   ` Eric McDonald
2003-11-19 19:07     ` Lincoln Peters

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0311191448090.31399-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu \
    --to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
    --cc=hronne@comhem.se \
    --cc=sampln@sbcglobal.net \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).