From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8088 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2003 18:04:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8078 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2003 18:04:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 18:04:10 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:04:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AF77001B; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:04:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:52:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Jim Kingdon Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Rebuilding Units That Turn In-Reply-To: <200311201757.hAKHvI820445@panix5.panix.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2003 18:04:09.0172 (UTC) FILETIME=[B1EC7140:01C3AF90] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00866.txt.bz2 On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Jim Kingdon wrote: > > The table is hp-to-garrison. When used in this manner, it destroys > > the old unit . . . has a few serious problems > > Uh, guys? Maybe it would be simpler to just add a damage-affects-icon > table rather than all this change type complexity? (at least for the > case currently being discussed). > > I won't try to figure out what the syntax would be, but I'm thinking > of something like: > > unit type infantry uses (image-name "soldiers") from 50%-100% > unit type infantry uses (image-name "bloody-soldiers") from 20%-50% > unit type infantry uses (image-name "staggering-soldiers") from 0%-20% I believe that more than an icon is at stake here. Damaged units have lessened capabilities (which cannot be wholly addressed through acp-damage-effect). Eric