From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15126 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2003 21:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15119 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 21:53:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 21:53:48 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:53:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314D87004F; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:52:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:56:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Hans Ronne Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Xconq output files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2003 21:53:44.0754 (UTC) FILETIME=[C349F120:01C3B467] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00927.txt.bz2 On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hans Ronne wrote: > That would be nice if it works, but I wouldn't spend too much time on it. I don't think it would require too much time. I just haven't had any quality time to spend with Xconq lately.... > going to be used only on Windows, .txt is fine with me. It is, after all, > what Windows users expect to see. Okay, fine. That makes my life easier. Now as far as the directories part of this thread goes: Are we going to change things or are we going to leave them until after 7.5? Eric