From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5752 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2003 04:16:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5657 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 04:16:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 04:16:03 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:16:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AEA70012; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:15:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 04:46:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Stan Shebs Cc: Xconq list Subject: Re: Reduced Visibility Table? In-Reply-To: <3FCBCF93.7070406@apple.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2003 04:16:00.0560 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE28F300:01C3B88A] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00946.txt.bz2 On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Stan Shebs wrote: > Heh, it's very messy coding to have a unit be there and not there at the > same time. > AI, UI, plan, and task code should only ever iterate over the stack of > images, > never over the real units. Action prep sometimes needs to know, > sometimes not, > which is part of the messiness. As long as we have Stan's attention :-) and we are talking about plan and task code, I do recall Hans seeking comment on the rationale for broadcasting tasks in the network code. Also, while we're on the subject, why is there some entanglement between what I believe Peter referred to as "referee code" and "AI code"? Eric