public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Peter Garrone <pgarrone@acay.com.au>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Standard game problems in windows (20031214) version
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312171125020.7552-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031217075755.GB819@leonardo>


Hi Peter, others,

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Peter Garrone wrote:

> > I don't think we should automatically move in any direction other 
> > than that specified by the user. Second-guessing the player is 
> > generally not a good idea.
> 
> I disagree. The path-finding implies that a move is possibly different.
> An aircraft, directed to go from A to B, might fly to C to get some
> fuel.

I don't entirely disagree when one is precomputing a path, though 
I still think that one must think about how tight do you want to 
keep the fuel budget when determining a path. If you say that a 
unit should refuel once it has traversed enough path to use 50% of 
its fuel, then you are quite possibly producing a very inefficient 
path, even if it is the only one that is essentially guaranteed to 
be safe. 

The case I was looking at was: what happens if we get a certain 
distance along a path and find that our primary refueling 
opportunity might have vanished? And my answer is the same as 
Jim's: the user needs to decide. Obviously if the 
refueling point is on the path and can be reached/utilized, then 
you let the automatic movement continue without user intervention; 
I certainly was not disputing that....

  Regards,
    Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-17 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-16 14:28 Martin Fehlhaber
2003-12-16 16:42 ` Hans Ronne
2003-12-16 17:18 ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-16 19:14   ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-16 22:55     ` Eric McDonald
2003-12-16 23:09       ` Bruno Boettcher
2003-12-17 10:27         ` Jim Kingdon
2003-12-17 10:28           ` Peter Garrone
2003-12-17 15:37       ` Peter Garrone
2003-12-17 16:54         ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2003-12-17 10:42     ` Peter Garrone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0312171125020.7552-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu \
    --to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
    --cc=pgarrone@acay.com.au \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).