From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26858 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2003 16:19:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26849 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2003 16:19:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2003 16:19:51 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:19:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4418470037; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:19:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:00:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Lincoln Peters Cc: Xconq list Subject: Re: More clues about that evasive pathfinding bug In-Reply-To: <1071725112.25715.296.camel@odysseus> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2003 16:19:50.0599 (UTC) FILETIME=[C316FD70:01C3C582] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg01076.txt.bz2 Hi Lincoln, others, On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Lincoln Peters wrote: > try to make a unit attack another unit that it cannot attack > (acp-to-attack = 0). I will try to track it down this weekend, unless someone else beats me to it. Thanks for the reports. Eric