From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20319 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2003 04:25:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20312 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 04:25:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO garm.central.cmich.local) (141.209.15.48) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 04:25:10 -0000 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:25:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C9470024; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:25:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:54:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Lincoln Peters Cc: Xconq list Subject: Re: annoying new bug in movement In-Reply-To: <1072152692.31574.1730.camel@odysseus> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2003 04:25:09.0149 (UTC) FILETIME=[BFD1BCD0:01C3C90C] X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg01104.txt.bz2 Hi Lincoln, On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Lincoln Peters wrote: > I just tested the new patch with bolodd2.g, and found that, although an > ACP is no longer burned when a move action fails, I still get an error > when I try to make a naval unit move into water: > > Your 1st boat was unable to perform requested move to 30,13 That is the error notification that I added to the code. As I mentioned, but perhaps was not clear, I made no serious attempt to isolate the underlying problem. My "fix" was just to deaden the pain somewhat. I don't really feel responsible for this bug (aside from checking in the patch (from someone else) that likely introduced it), and thus am not feeling highly motivated to fix it at this point. > Your 1st boat can never do this! I think my error message is more descriptive. :-) > It would seem that a bug still exists somewhere in the pathfinding > code... Yes. Or more generally, the movement code. Eric