From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-3673-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19824 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2004 18:26:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19817 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 18:26:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ob2.cmich.edu) (141.209.20.21)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 18:26:34 -0000
Received: from egate1.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85])
	by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i69IMqP6028661;
	Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:22:52 -0400
Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:26:30 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D770270018; Fri,  9 Jul 2004 14:26:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 18:32:00 -0000
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Exploratory Transports
In-Reply-To: <l03130304bd1491610941@[212.181.162.155]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407091421100.21169-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2004 18:26:30.0395 (UTC) FILETIME=[4130D4B0:01C465E2]
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 () 
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00688.txt.bz2

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Hans Ronne wrote:

> Heh, the obvious solution would be to fix the transport code so that
> transports do what they are supposed to do, that is transport units from
> point A to B.
> 
> This is on my to-do list after I am done fixing the resupply code.

Well, it was on my todo list after improving the help system code. 
I guess I'll have to find some other AI-hacking exercise to 
indulge in, prior to attempting improvements of the scorekeeper 
situation.

The fact that some of our todo list items are starting to overlap 
might be taken as a good sign that we are _finally_ approaching 
some sort of closure on the 7.5 release cycle....

Eric