From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-3770-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 741 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2004 19:50:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 723 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 19:50:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ob2.cmich.edu) (141.209.20.21)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 19:50:19 -0000
Received: from egate1.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85])
	by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6KJkBP8010469;
	Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:46:11 -0400
Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:49:57 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 146567000B; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:50:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:36:00 -0000
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
Cc: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@panix.com>, <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Weird fuel behavior
In-Reply-To: <l03130300bd231e9e65a6@[212.181.162.155]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407201545390.6451-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jul 2004 19:49:57.0304 (UTC) FILETIME=[BC15C380:01C46E92]
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 () 
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00785.txt.bz2

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Hans Ronne wrote:

> >In SDL, I assume we'd get to write our own window code (or use one of
> >the many libraries out there which are designed to go on top of SDL).
> >I don't know whether that is better or worse than having (possibly
> >buggy or quirky) floating windows provided for us.
> 
> SDL doesn't support multiple windows at all. So I guess one would have to
> implement something like a row of unit info panes in order to examin
> several units at once.

If this is true, then it is somewhat of a blow against SDL. 
However, I don't really intend to work on the "pure" SDL interface 
so much as an [appropriately ifdeffed] SDL/GUI toolkit (possibly 
GTK) hybrid, __sometime after 7.5 is released.

Eric