From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20829 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2004 16:47:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20822 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 16:47:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ob2.cmich.edu) (141.209.20.21) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 16:47:19 -0000 Received: from egate1.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85]) by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7BGgIP8022329; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:42:26 -0400 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:44:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A7970011; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Hans Ronne Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: IMFApp Office In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2004 16:44:45.0338 (UTC) FILETIME=[81ECCFA0:01C47FC2] X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Spam-Score: -0.9 () X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00873.txt.bz2 On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Hans Ronne wrote: > I noticed this. I would say that what really happens is that those units > (not all of them) that have an 8x8 image for some reason is using it at > 16x16 magnification, too, instead of scaling down the 32x32 image. Really? At least in my closeups, it appeared that the top left corner of the 44x44 was appearing unscaled, and with the transparency colors unsuppressed) in the "16x16" (22x24?) view box. >I don't > think IMFApp is to blame for this, but rather the general image scaling > code (best_image) which is used by both Xconq and IMFApp. It is unusal to > provide 32x32 and 8x8 images, but not 16x16, so the code may get confused. Then this is even more bothersome to me, because I would like to provide an actual family of images which have distinct images (but same name) for each view size, and if the code that handles this is used in Xconq, then things could get ugly. Eric