From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-4216-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27205 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2004 17:47:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27193 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2004 17:47:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ob2.cmich.edu) (141.209.20.21)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 17:47:11 -0000
Received: from egate1.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85])
	by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8NHel41023111;
	Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:40:47 -0400
Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:47:07 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2510770023; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:47:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:59:00 -0000
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Elijah Meeks <elijahmeeks@yahoo.com>
Cc: mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca, <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Table Request: Accident-Occupant-Effect
In-Reply-To: <20040923145926.22913.qmail@web13124.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409231340210.10556-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 17:47:07.0919 (UTC) FILETIME=[587099F0:01C4A195]
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 () SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01231.txt.bz2

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Elijah Meeks wrote:

> > just one point of the material and use a
> > sufficiently small fractional
> > consumption rate (we do support fractional
> > consumption rates, right?).

Ugh, I would have to check on that one. My sense is that 
those tables are interpreted as strict integers, and not 
"stochastic values".

> That would work, also, but units that starve don't
> wreck, they vanish.  So it would still need a change
> to the code.

I implemented a 'wrecked-type-if-starved' table when I did the 
other 'wrecked-type-*' tables. Unless something got broken, this 
should still work; I think I tested it, and so I believe that it 
worked to begin with.

Eric