From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-4294-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18824 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2004 18:07:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18817 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2004 18:07:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ob2.cmich.edu) (141.209.20.21)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 18:07:47 -0000
Received: from egate1.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85])
	by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i91I1741031360;
	Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:01:07 -0400
Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:07:44 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8EE8E7001E; Fri,  1 Oct 2004 14:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:17:00 -0000
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Feneric Brown <feneric@saugus.net>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Offtopic] Ekskonk
In-Reply-To: <7279C394-136C-11D9-AC93-000393439120@saugus.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410011404330.744-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2004 18:07:44.0305 (UTC) FILETIME=[8CB02210:01C4A7E1]
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Spam-Score: -0.9 () 
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg01309.txt.bz2

On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Feneric Brown wrote:

> Don't worry; there are a few more.  Things like -ad, -ant, -at, -int, 
> -it, -ont, and -ot plus quite a few official (and some common 
> unofficial) suffixes exist to figure out, too.

Hmmm... I don't suppose Esperanto verbs have voice or mood, do 
they?

> >  (1) I have detected no repeated consonants or vowels thus far.
> Scii esperanto estas bona.

"To know Esperanto is good."

Okay, legitimate counterexample, since I didn't qualify the 
statement as applying to the roots only.

Eric