From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Lincoln Peters <sampln@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Xconq list <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Map-related deja-vu
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410011408140.744-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096609511.4050.17763.camel@localhost>
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Lincoln Peters wrote:
> I don't know much about the logic (?) behind generating random numbers.
There is much logic (determinism) behind computer generation of
"random" numbers. Most generators should more properly be called
pseudorandom number gnerators (PRNG's).
To get some "true" randomness, you have to look for sources that
cannot be [easily] modelled. One example is backscatter of laser
light off of a swirling fluid; use the coordinates of the
backscattered rays and, voila, you have something that might pass
the definition of "random".
> But I did find it rather surprising when the map looked exactly like the
> map I had played on just a few days ago.
As Matthew was saying, the statistical probability of such an
occurance is higher than one might suspect, __at least with the
current seeding mechanism.
> I doubt that an algorithm suitable to cryptographic work would be
> necessary for any game,
Not in the game itself. I was thinking more towards if Xconq ever
went to a secure client-server model.
> 3. I just got lucky.
Yep. It must have been your "birthday."
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-01 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-01 0:19 Lincoln Peters
2004-10-01 0:26 ` mskala
2004-10-01 0:49 ` Eric McDonald
2004-10-01 5:45 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-10-01 18:19 ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2004-10-01 18:47 ` Stan Shebs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0410011408140.744-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu \
--to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
--cc=sampln@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).