From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17972 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2005 18:11:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17956 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 18:11:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ob2.cmich.edu) (141.209.20.21) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 18:11:56 -0000 Received: from egate1.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85]) by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j38J0lxw016762; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:00:47 -0400 Received: from leon.phy.cmich.edu ([141.209.165.20]) by egate1.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:11:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leon.phy.cmich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFDA70017; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:11:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:11:00 -0000 From: Eric McDonald To: Lincoln Peters Cc: xconq7 Subject: Re: Xconq Mailing Lists - Please Read In-Reply-To: <1112975421.29266.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2005 18:11:42.0912 (UTC) FILETIME=[6AFB6C00:01C53C66] X-Spam-Score: -0.9 () X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 X-SW-Source: 2005/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Lincoln Peters wrote: > I noticed that the home page on RedHat's server makes no mention of the > move to the SourceForge site. Yes. I am well aware of that fact. >In fact, it apparently has not been > updated since May 24 of last year. That sounds about right. If you want to see it updated, then either I need to have assurances that Hans will not be having any more accidents (allegedly) that clobber my CVS commits, or you will need to get someone else to do it. Talk to Stan maybe.... >That could easily be a source of > confusion for a lot of people, especially as long as Google lists the > RedHat site at the top of the search results when someone does a search > for "Xconq" (Coop's website is listed second, and the SourceForge site > is listed eighth). Actually, it varies a fair amount. One of the reasons that the old site comes out higher is because it is cross-referenced in more categories in various directories. In the dmoz open directory, it is linked to one additional category. I could counter this by simply removing the primary reference to it, but I think that would be overstepping the bounds of my editorial discretion on dmoz.... Eric