* Re: Unit view bugs?
@ 2003-05-16 16:29 Elijah Meeks
2003-05-20 0:09 ` Hans Ronne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elijah Meeks @ 2003-05-16 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xconq7
I haven't tried to test the code, but in my regular
operation, I've noticed no problems.
Good job. I guess this means you can start on all
those simple, painless upgrades I requested.
Shouldn't take you more than, oh, a couple of days at
the most, right?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Unit view bugs?
2003-05-16 16:29 Unit view bugs? Elijah Meeks
@ 2003-05-20 0:09 ` Hans Ronne
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Ronne @ 2003-05-20 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Elijah Meeks; +Cc: xconq7
>I haven't tried to test the code, but in my regular
>operation, I've noticed no problems.
>
>Good job. I guess this means you can start on all
>those simple, painless upgrades I requested.
>Shouldn't take you more than, oh, a couple of days at
>the most, right?
I'm working on improving imfapp right now, which is one of the things you
and others asked for some time ago.
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Unit view bugs?
2003-05-15 5:26 Hans Ronne
@ 2003-05-16 0:55 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2003-05-16 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hronne; +Cc: xconq7
> Or have people just been too busy to test out the new code?
In my case, this would be it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Unit view bugs?
@ 2003-05-15 5:26 Hans Ronne
2003-05-16 0:55 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Ronne @ 2003-05-15 5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xconq7
There has not been a single bug report since I checked in the rewritten
unit view code two weeks ago. Usually, all sorts of bugs pop up after a
major code revision like this. Am I to understand that everything worked
fine this time? Or have people just been too busy to test out the new code?
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-16 16:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-16 16:29 Unit view bugs? Elijah Meeks
2003-05-20 0:09 ` Hans Ronne
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-15 5:26 Hans Ronne
2003-05-16 0:55 ` Jim Kingdon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).