From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25928 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2003 20:23:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25911 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 20:23:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp5.hy.skanova.net) (195.67.199.134) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 20:23:12 -0000 Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp5.hy.skanova.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8GKN5gx017727; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:23:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.telia.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <16230.54033.689000.36765@lapjr.intranet.kiel.bmiag.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:32:00 -0000 To: Eric McDonald From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: Build system overhaul (Was: Tcl/Tk Interface Unification) Cc: Juergen Ruehle , xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 >On second thought, how about we just make libconq_mw32.a and >libconqlow_mw32.a for anything that is doing a mingw32 build and >make the regular kernel libs (once, not multiple times) for >anything that is doing a cygwin or other build? > >This would save us the hassle of separate build dirs or remaking >the kernel multiple times. And since we are using special flags >with the mingw32 builds anyway, it should be trivial to make >us link against the alternate libraries as well. I was just about to suggest that. If we need different variants of the libraries, we could still build them in the same directory provided that we give them different names. Hans