From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32079 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2003 19:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32071 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2003 19:20:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.hy.skanova.net) (195.67.199.143) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2003 19:20:13 -0000 Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp10.hy.skanova.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9JJKBgs017987; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:20:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200310191539.h9JFdZD25591@panix5.panix.com> References: (message from Hans Ronne on Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:15:22 +0200) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:11:00 -0000 To: Jim Kingdon From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: Xconq bug fixes + binaries Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 >Hopefully it is understood by all that any submission will get >modified (if not immediately, then eventually as xconq evolves). Indeed. There is code in xconq I once wrote that I hardly recognize any more :-). >There is one legitimate complaint here, though, and that is how it is >described in the ChangeLog. I've added the word "(modified)" to make >it clear that what was checked in contains work from both Peter >Garonne and Hans Ronne. Right. I did add (modified) in the first checkin but not in the second one. The entry instead mentions some of the stuff I added explicitly (support for font preferences in the materials list) but not the other changes. Hans