From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26130 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2003 04:05:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26082 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 04:05:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp14.fre.skanova.net) (195.67.227.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 04:05:33 -0000 Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp14.fre.skanova.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA345N2n006854; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 05:05:24 +0100 (CET) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:22:00 -0000 To: Eric McDonald From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: MSVC build environment? Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com, vanevery@indiegamedesign.com X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2 >> > An alternative to cygwin/mingw is to use a Windows native build >> > environment. It is now possible to build xconq for Windows >> > using either Visual C or CodeWarrior. > >> as I can tell, and as far as you seem to say. So who is really doing >> this? > >No one, afaik. I think Hans uses CodeWarrior. Yep. >> Is building under MSVC a reality, or a claim? > >It is not a claim. It _might_ be a reality. :-) Juergen Ruehle posted instructions for how to build xconq under Visual C (I think those were supposed to go into the empty part of INSTALL-win). I tested it several months ago just to see if it worked, and it did. Hans