From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7287 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2003 02:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7280 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2003 02:33:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp14.fre.skanova.net) (195.67.227.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2003 02:33:39 -0000 Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp14.fre.skanova.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA82XN2n016780; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 03:33:31 +0100 (CET) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 02:55:00 -0000 To: Eric McDonald From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: Standardizing the Windows build Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 >On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Hans Ronne wrote: > >> So my guess is that you would find it easier to work on the Windows >> interface, given your stated interests and preferences. A Windows-native >> (non-Tcl) interface would be a very welcome contribution to Xconq. > >Yes. If we swing to SDL as our primary interface during the next >release cycle, one might want to consider native Win32 support >for the UI elements such as menus and windows. Or using a >cross-platform library of UI elements (such as wxWindows, though >it is C++ code).... In fact, the SDL Win32 libraries are now based on DirectX. So we already have that in the SDL interface. Hans