From: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
To: Peter Garrone <pgarrone@acay.com.au>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: transport and the bug + fixed
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <l03130300bbf42b9f4d3f@[212.181.162.155]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031203221319.GA1306@leonardo>
> With respect to the desynch bug, one obvious possibility did occur to me.
>If the
> pathfinding is invoked from the mplayer or ai code, then the found path
> is cached in the local process, but not in other processes. Then when
> the non-local process has to find a direction, it will usually find the
> same path, but there is a possibility that conditions have changed and
> a different path could be
> found and cached, causing differences down the track. So this should
> possibly give you a line of attack on the problem.
This was indeed the case! I nuked the cahce code and the desynch bug went
away. Further experiments showed that nuking get_dir_from_cache is all that
is required. path_get_next_cached_move and path_get_next_cached_node do not
contribute to the desync. Which is good, because taking out these functions
as well has a huge impact on performance.
The bad news is that no transports or bombers are ever built. I thought
previously that this was a consequence of the move.c hack (off-list
discussion) but apparently this is a general problem with the current
path-finding code which has nothing to do with the desynch. I have seen
other problems with transport path-finding as well, such as ships getting
move-to tasks to inland destinations. I have not tested yet if these
problems are still there in your latest developmental code.
In any case, I will check in the get_dir_from_cache hack. We can worry
about correct transport path finding later. It is good to be back in sync!
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-04 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312012235490.3913-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu>
[not found] ` <20031201094951.GB812@leonardo>
[not found] ` <l03130300bbf4024592fd@[212.181.162.155]>
2003-12-04 0:22 ` transport and the bug Peter Garrone
2003-12-04 6:34 ` Hans Ronne [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='l03130300bbf42b9f4d3f@[212.181.162.155]' \
--to=hronne@comhem.se \
--cc=pgarrone@acay.com.au \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).