From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-3626-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20887 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2004 12:48:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20877 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2004 12:48:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO av8-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net) (81.228.8.110)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2004 12:48:26 -0000
Received: by av8-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 69F1D37E49; Sun,  4 Jul 2004 14:48:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.178])
	by av8-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5C5F037E42; Sun,  4 Jul 2004 14:48:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155])
	by smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C0EA837E42; Sun,  4 Jul 2004 14:48:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se
Message-Id: <l03130300bd0daacd36d4@[212.181.162.155]>
In-Reply-To: <32793.68.122.234.217.1088918538.squirrel@webmail.io.com>
References: <200407040055.i640tDx17333@panix5.panix.com>
 <1088896371.19592.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>   
 <2465.68.126.82.218.1088896685.squirrel@webmail.io.com>   
 <200407040055.i640tDx17333@panix5.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:13:00 -0000
To: "Henry J. Cobb" <hcobb@io.com>
From: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
Subject: Re: Just say no to bungee paratroopers.
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00641.txt.bz2

I have checked in your first patch. Thanks for submitting it. I made two
changes. First, I moved it inside capture_unit (which is called from
several places). Second, I added code for trying to enter the same cell if
the capturing unit is unable to enter the captured unit itself.

The second problem (what to do if an attack from within a transport fails)
is a little more complicated and requires additional thought. Perhaps we
should make the fate of such units a GDL option, as Eric suggested.

Hans