From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14320 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 18:23:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14303 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 18:23:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO av6-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net) (81.228.8.106) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 18:23:53 -0000 Received: by av6-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9AB9F37E56; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:23:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.177]) by av6-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D7137E43; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:23:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B78C37E56; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:23:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:47:00 -0000 To: Eric McDonald From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: Major bug and what to do about it (long) Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00929.txt.bz2 >> The probability of hitting an unseen unit should not be affected by the >> fact that you think you are shooting at something which is not there. > >Why? Surely if you were firing at an individual unit, then the >chance of another just happening to be in its place coupled with >the chance of hitting the substitute unit should be smaller than >the hit chance of directly aiming at the substitute unit. Not at all. I am talking about a fire-into substitute action here, not a fire-at action against the unseen unit (which would be impossible by definition). So the hit chance should really be the same regardless of where the unit is located in the cell. Hans