From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7439 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2003 23:27:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7432 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 23:27:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp14.fre.skanova.net) (195.67.227.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 23:27:01 -0000 Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp14.fre.skanova.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB1NQgMT014361; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 00:26:43 +0100 (CET) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20031201231823.GH1378@adlp.org> References: <20031201221425.20869.qmail@web13123.mail.yahoo.com> <20031201221425.20869.qmail@web13123.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:32:00 -0000 To: bboett@adlp.org From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: Reduced Visibility Table? Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00937.txt.bz2 >On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:14:25PM -0800, Elijah Meeks wrote: >> Is there a way to make units less visible--submarines >> and spies, for example, that could only be seen by >> adjacent units (Even if the other unit has a visual >> range higher than 1)? >since reading this.... is there a way to let those units coexist with >enemy units in the same cell? > >i would relly like to use the subs to act as spies and make some >commando operations, but since allready a fighter barrage can detect >them, it makes not much sense.... True. If you fire into the dark you may hit enemy units that are sitting out there, even if you cannot see them. Which makes sense. If we were to make invisible units invulnerable as well, they would become way too powerful. Hans