From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16845 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2003 17:06:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16797 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2003 17:06:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp5.hy.skanova.net) (195.67.199.134) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2003 17:06:42 -0000 Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.162.155]) by smtp5.hy.skanova.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5HH6eWq015659; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:06:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.telia.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <200306171455.h5HEtcU11307@panix5.panix.com> <200306171455.h5HEtcU11307@panix5.panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:11:00 -0000 To: Eric McDonald From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: xconq gnatsweb Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 >On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Jim Kingdon wrote: > >> I looked at bug 4 and it seems to already be fixed. But I don't know >> how to log in to gnats. The whole thing seems to be rather less easy >> to use than bugzilla... > >I think the gcc people switched over to bugzilla a while ago, and for a fairly >large open source community like that to make the switch, bugzilla must have >some merit over the others.... > >If no one is planning on maintaining a defect tracking system, then I >suppose we >should submit PR's to the list? That's usually a better idea. The gnatsweb system did not work for the first year or so, which is why it never got widely used by the xconq community. I try to fix bugs that are reported to this list (or directly to me) as soon as possible. In contrast, it's been several months since I last looked at the gnatsweb page. Hans